| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
dinamo_fan_4_ever

Joined: 05 Dec 2005 Posts: 649 Location: bucharest
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 21:43 Post subject: |
|
|
i just think retro implied that timisoara does not deserve the 3 points as they lost but indeed it is almost identical with the "bricheta" case but i think that if 3 points were given to steaua just after that, timisoara is even more entitled to the same thing.
what i would like to know is if it ends up officially that rapid broke the rules by purpose...should they get extra penalty ? i remember that there was a case after brasov - rapid when rapid players left the pitch...i think they got extra 2 points penalty..and i dont say it only for the sake of dinamo gaining an advantage...i think that intentionally breaking the rules should bring extra penalty. just if the final verdict saids it was intention of cause. _________________ Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics...
Even if you win, you're still retarded. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
retroactive Senior Member

Joined: 17 Feb 2006 Posts: 1337 Location: Bucuresti
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 22:20 Post subject: |
|
|
| badgerboy wrote: | | It looks like Rapid were the bad guys - perhaps with the collusion of some people at the LPF. But then he puts it out there that actually it's Timisoara who are the cunning string pullers as someone wants them to get 3 points for a game they might have lost even if Rapid had fielded 11 eligible players. |
This situation looks suspiciosully in favor of Timisoara, i admit, but i have not made such accusation, as you suggest. The cases of Dacian Varga and Tiberiu Balan where throughly discussed in romanian media all the week until the match, in case you think that this is an obscure case. I just hoped before the match that those Rapid guys know what they are doing and if they win with Timisoara, the victory stays.
And to answer your question, yes i think Timisoara is stronger than Rapid and a higher threat for Steaua, in both lot density and constance. Rapid however in Giulesti can beat anyone and if they score first, their fans can help them to mentain the result until the end, no matter the odds. This is a positive statement that i cannot make in favor of any other home fans in Romania.
I cannot speculate on any hidden agenda do you think i have, but if you want to ask me something specific, i will answer.
And one other thing, you and any other 'neutral' users who do not support a team based on ideology with the caracter of a religion more than a temporary sympaty (a summer flame?), you cannot really understand executor or any other fan.
| badgerboy wrote: | | Suggested result - Rapid lose at least the 3 points they gained (more would be better) but Timisoara actually lost the game so also get 0 points. Hence you've turned a situation where - at best - two of your title rivals should have split two points into one where they both get 0. |
Not really. 90% of my comments were, why the situation wasn't prevented when it could had been, by both interested sides: Rapid or LPF, where do you say that Rapid is the only guilty party and you act very agressively about it and let out key details.
As it stands right now, IF Rapid is found guilty, officialy, there is no way arond 3-0 FF, and a match replay would indeed make Timisoara play the same match twice, which will not be fair to them, and we don't even have regulation for that. The only way to remain the result on the field will be Rapid to win the case at TAS, to proove that even if the mistake was made, was made at LPF or AMFB, and they were mislead; even in that case there is no way for them to justity the lack of profesionalism in this problem, and i frankly find the administration respect for the team's achivements disturbingly low.
| badgerboy wrote: | Yay - I knew there had to be a way to make Steaua the villains in all this. And Retro showed me the way  |
There is always is a way, and a job for some of users here. _________________ www.steauafc.ro |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
retroactive Senior Member

Joined: 17 Feb 2006 Posts: 1337 Location: Bucuresti
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 22:56 Post subject: |
|
|
2 seasons ago Steaua won 3-0 FF against Rapid in a different situation. PSG also won 3-0 FF against Rapid because of floodlight problems, the most recent events. I understand that Rapid actually lost 5 time by forfait, in total (?). This says something about the organistaion problems at Rapid.
Steaua won 3-0 FF against PSG, because the french team used a suspended player; although, we also won in the field 3-2. There has to be accountability if one team try to cheat the other, by using a player who don't have the right to play, or any other advantage that is trying illegaly to procure against the opponent.
But what if there is a third party, who don't only have the power, but also the responsability to prevent a forfait situation from occuring in the first place? There may be various reasons: revenge, the need to take front page from time to time, maby even an alliance or a dept to pay to one of the partie involved.
I want people to understand this very well, those guys from LPF, Dumitru Dragomir, Valentin Alexandrescu, Doru Viorel Ursu, etc, they have nothing better to do when these derbies are played, but to watch them on stadium (especially if they play in Bucharest) or TV, both proffessionaly and because they eat football. They watch matches, they go on television they speak about odds, teams values, tactics, coaches. Do you realise that they watched this match, the super goal scored by Matic, with the knowledge that Timisoara will win the match in any case? If a Timisoara player will hit some Rapid player in the face and will be reded, that red will not count further? You speak about these things, but i don't think you conceptualize the seriousness.
It is one thing to be put in front of a 'done fact' post match or during the match, where you cannot prevent anything, and you have to apply the regulation, and something else if you 'hold' an information that cleary benefits to one party. _________________ www.steauafc.ro |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dinamo_fan_4_ever

Joined: 05 Dec 2005 Posts: 649 Location: bucharest
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 23:41 Post subject: |
|
|
| retroactive wrote: | | It is one thing to be put in front of a 'done fact' post match or during the match, where you cannot prevent anything, and you have to apply the regulation, and something else if you 'hold' an information that cleary benefits to one party. |
and again i combat you by asking what do you mean "hold" as log as they faxed a document that states that the visas are canceled, document that was read by the rapid administration ?
if you get an official fax like that telling you that you cannot go abroad..you read it, try to appeal it but don't succeed and still go abroad, they catch you and lock you in for a couple of years..who is to blame but YOU ? _________________ Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics...
Even if you win, you're still retarded. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
retroactive Senior Member

Joined: 17 Feb 2006 Posts: 1337 Location: Bucuresti
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 00:30 Post subject: |
|
|
And if want to speak about 'Bricheta aka the lighter' we discuss that too.
Media, wrongly perpetuate the ideea that 'a lighter' stopped that very fair match and result on the field. There could be nothing further from the truth. Like the LPF in the most recent scandal, you hold the knowlege that the refferee wanted to continue the match after that incident and gave an ultimatum, which he was entitled to and wasn't respected.
Some people, either in an acute paranoia or plain stupidity, think that only an innocent object in the form of an lighter (with negative mass) was thrown and by a series of unexplain phenomenums that only object hit the reff.
You are dead wrong, that field was a football hazard and the players target practice from the first half, only that after Sapunaru scored, the things get worse. I saw on cameras how Nesu was hit by another red lighther in the foot, when he was static as well as many objects flying around every time the game was stoped. And the cameras only catch a small portion of the match. Rapid stadium is very close and the field, and i heard Manea just in the night previous to the game, that Rapid will never put nets, because their fans are too civilised.
The point is that the players cannot play in those conditions, neither the reff do his job, because your focus have to be split; to be also forced to equalise Rapid in Giulesti is mission impossible.
The fact that you say that Rapid were winning that match, fairly, on the field, it is just bullshit. Those weren't 73 minutes of foobtball played on the field, because the guest players were so targetet from the start (you heard the numerous annoucements from the club station?). So, nothing that Rapid achived on the field was fair twards Steaua.
Why the security forces did not evacuate the troublemakers? Because they were quite content with the situation, obviously. Now, are those things happening somewhere else? Of course. The media gave countless examples of troublemakers on other stadiums, conveniently neglecting to mention how those individuals are escorted ASAP from the stadium by a half of dozen of stewards, so they are in no furter position to treathen the match.
Now that match was stopped fairly? Hell, yes. Then the comittees had to gave a 3-0 FF, forced by the suspention of the match by the reff. If there was anything else they could have done to keep Steaua at 10-20p behind CFR ... they would have jump to it.
Also the media did everything in their power to influence the decision, 2-3 individuals from Rapid, galery heads, were invited each night for 2 weeks, to speak about morality (of not leting Rapid cheat 90 minutes and just 73) and to curse Steaua, all for the great good of football, of course football meaning in that year CFR.
----------------------
So no this recent case has nothing in common with what happened them, except probably the penality of the same team.
My first impression, was the match to be replayed, because i really belived that if we remove the fans from the equation (and what they did in the 73'), Steaua had the strength to win that match. If you don't belive, i could care less.
But then i saw that Rapid and media make Steaua the villan, Copos announcing time bombs and the fact that he has infos about the case and the fan, which i guess he keep untill he dies. Later on we learned the fan who threw the most mediatisated lighter was indeed a Rapid fan (for many years) and not a sniper on Becali's payroll; this information was also very little mediatisated, because didn't served CFR's case. Yes it was very litlle to do with Rapid, all that lighter case.
Nedless to say that, how that case was presented in media and by Rapid, made the 3p FF to seem very little compensation for Steaua. And NO, i didn't wanted more points, i wanted LPF and FRF to respect their regulations which applied in the past and to punish Rapid with a FIT penality, for all the unbased accusations and insults that they threw officialy in Steaua's direction. LPF did considered that a suiting penality will be 200 Euro and fined accordingly, while Steaua's brand suffered milion euros loses and the real conflict with a part of the fans originated there.
But, the things didn't stopped there, Rapid felt compeled by an unimaginable revenge and hatred to give 3p to CFR also, so they made an obvious fix with CFR, which was of course legitimated by mass-media. And Because CFR entered a phase where they couldn't beat relegated teams anymore, they found the 'strength' to beat Dinamo too, which wasn't enough, so Dinamo and FRF finished the job in the direct match with Steaua 2, and CFR won an deserved title of champion, where all that remains it Becali's 'suitcase', a stupid attempt to level the playfield by stimulating a team to win, against overwelming odds.
In case your morality is a little curious, after 2 years, Becali recived his 'suitcase' back, but the appologies are standing in CFR's glorious trophee colection.
If you have further morality issues ... _________________ www.steauafc.ro |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
retroactive Senior Member

Joined: 17 Feb 2006 Posts: 1337 Location: Bucuresti
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 02:09 Post subject: |
|
|
| dinamo_fan_4_ever wrote: | and again i combat you by asking what do you mean "hold" as log as they faxed a document that states that the visas are canceled, document that was read by the rapid administration ?
if you get an official fax like that telling you that you cannot go abroad..you read it, try to appeal it but don't succeed and still go abroad, they catch you and lock you in for a couple of years..who is to blame but YOU ? |
Do you know what the procedures in giving the visas are? Should had Rapid made another request to LPF based on the new AMFB decion? If this is the case, then the Rapid will loose, legaly at any court.
What are you telling me, that LPF is legally covered? We'll see, maby they are; they are the motherfuckers who made their own regulations, the first thing they did is to cover their asses in any forseeable issue.
But let's have some common-sense, please. Why don't you want to ankowledge that LPF could have done more to prevent this, if not for Rapid, then for other considerents? Maby even their own image, if not the other teams and competition.
So they sent a FAX and their job is done, this is what are you saying? Not good enough. When i want to sent a message, i make sure that it was properly recived, otherwise there is no point, and there is no need for the clubs to pay LPF.
So they learn that Rapid (probably confused by the AMFB decision, which i think LPF recived also) intent to use the 2 players, which i'm sure they did from the media, as other less informed tv viewers: they should had send AT LEAST another fax, because it was obvious that their first FAX didn't get trough or was misinterpreted, COULD I BE ANY MORE CLEAR THAN THAT?
There is a paper shortage, that i don't know of? They recive their salaries from the clubs, from Rapid as well, to protect their interes as well. It was clear at some point that the first fax didn't get trough, maby the incompetent guy who recive it was fired that very day (joke), what's the harm in sending another FAX. Isn't the all point, to make Rapid aware of your decision? Because if that's not the point, i rest my case. If it is, then try again, untill you are sure they get it. And man, this is not an humanitarian gesture from LPF, this is their job, which can be acomplished with good intention or with bad intention or incompetence. _________________ www.steauafc.ro |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
moro Senior Member
Joined: 16 Aug 2007 Posts: 3045 Location: Thionville, France
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 09:33 Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, they needed two fax now. How about a recommended letter?
Or a messenger on a white horse. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dinamo_fan_4_ever

Joined: 05 Dec 2005 Posts: 649 Location: bucharest
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 11:29 Post subject: |
|
|
| retroactive wrote: | So they sent a FAX and their job is done, this is what are you saying? Not good enough. When i want to sent a message, i make sure that it was properly recived, otherwise there is no point, and there is no need for the clubs to pay LPF.
So they learn that Rapid (probably confused by the AMFB decision, which i think LPF recived also) intent to use the 2 players, which i'm sure they did from the media, as other less informed tv viewers: they should had send AT LEAST another fax, because it was obvious that their first FAX didn't get trough or was misinterpreted, COULD I BE ANY MORE CLEAR THAN THAT?
There is a paper shortage, that i don't know of? They recive their salaries from the clubs, from Rapid as well, to protect their interes as well. It was clear at some point that the first fax didn't get trough, maby the incompetent guy who recive it was fired that very day (joke), what's the harm in sending another FAX. Isn't the all point, to make Rapid aware of your decision? Because if that's not the point, i rest my case. If it is, then try again, untill you are sure they get it. And man, this is not an humanitarian gesture from LPF, this is their job, which can be acomplished with good intention or with bad intention or incompetence. |
a fax like that comes with a need of sending back the receiving confirmation. it is not valid until rapid sends back the confirmation and ..alas!.. they got the confirmation )) LPF is more than covered
would you imagine what would happen if everyone used your thinking and dis-consider the official documents from LPF saying that although they got the fax and confirmed it, LPF is still at blame for not drowning the city in posters with "wanted" and the pics of varga and balan )) wild wild west !!! yeeeeeha ! _________________ Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics...
Even if you win, you're still retarded.
Last edited by dinamo_fan_4_ever on Sat Mar 13, 2010 11:51; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
moro Senior Member
Joined: 16 Aug 2007 Posts: 3045 Location: Thionville, France
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 11:37 Post subject: |
|
|
| There's also the possibility to hire a guy to watch the fax, a guy to watch the guy who watch the fax and two or three supervisors, just in case. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ognimanaw

Joined: 02 May 2009 Posts: 110 Location: Munich
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 14:23 Post subject: |
|
|
| Hey guys, what about the liga1 prediciton game dinamo_fan_4_ever suggested? I think its a neat idea. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kraken

Joined: 30 Oct 2007 Posts: 818 Location: cluj-praha-galway
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 14:49 Post subject: |
|
|
yeah, but should there also be a special thread in it, to select which games might be decided at the good aul' green table?  _________________ Harraby and Stjarnan forever! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
moro Senior Member
Joined: 16 Aug 2007 Posts: 3045 Location: Thionville, France
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 15:03 Post subject: |
|
|
| ognimanaw wrote: | | Hey guys, what about the liga1 prediciton game dinamo_fan_4_ever suggested? I think its a neat idea. |
I think there are too many games on this forum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Executor Senior Member

Joined: 23 Nov 2005 Posts: 3024 Location: Ploiesti/Bucharest, Romania
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 15:41 Post subject: |
|
|
| kraken wrote: | yeah, but should there also be a special thread in it, to select which games might be decided at the good aul' green table?  |
Lo and behold! We have another candidate!! Steaua could lose 0-3 the game with Oţelul for fielding an ineligible player. What player? Bogdan Stancu.
Apparently there's an article regarding the transfer of players which states that if a player doesn't want or cannot come to any NT (regardless of age) no matter the reason, he is not allowed to play for 5 days after that NT game. And Stancu was called to the U23 game this Wednesday. Steaua played Friday. That's just 2 days. Ooopsss
And now it's time for CFR to miscalculate the number of foreigners they'll send tonight against Dinamo and use more than 5 non-EU players at the same time.
By the way, I doubt Rapid will lose. Apparently, the regulations state that the decision of canceling a player's visa can only be taken by a committee, not by one man (that Cezar Ionescu mentioned earlier). LPF kindof acknowledged they did that, by answering: "we take any decision the way we want", which doesn't seem right. I'm very hopefull  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dinamo_fan_4_ever

Joined: 05 Dec 2005 Posts: 649 Location: bucharest
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 17:49 Post subject: |
|
|
| Executor wrote: |
Apparently there's an article regarding the transfer of players which states that if a player doesn't want or cannot come to any NT (regardless of age) no matter the reason, he is not allowed to play for 5 days after that NT game. And Stancu was called to the U23 game this Wednesday. Steaua played Friday. That's just 2 days. Ooopsss |
well. i bet steaua won't get even close to discussing the case. it is hopeless from the start. if anyone pushes it FRF can give steaua an extra point to punish the parts that had the nerve to challenge the best team that won UCL in '86 and one of the key players of romanian football: bogdan stancu. shame on them ! specially danilescu from dinamo. 1 point penalty for
dinamo as well !
| Quote: |
By the way, I doubt Rapid will lose. Apparently, the regulations state that the decision of canceling a player's visa can only be taken by a committee, not by one man (that Cezar Ionescu mentioned earlier). LPF kindof acknowledged they did that, by answering: "we take any decision the way we want", which doesn't seem right. I'm very hopefull  |
well, i still think that the decision is made by the committee nut is signed by the civil servant delegated by LPF to sign official papers i dont think rapid can get away so easy as steaua will. _________________ Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics...
Even if you win, you're still retarded. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dinamo_fan_4_ever

Joined: 05 Dec 2005 Posts: 649 Location: bucharest
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 17:54 Post subject: |
|
|
| moro wrote: | | ognimanaw wrote: | | Hey guys, what about the liga1 prediciton game dinamo_fan_4_ever suggested? I think its a neat idea. |
I think there are too many games on this forum. |
i think that there might be as many games as one wishes to join. don't you ?
i would gladly try to organize such a game if i knew how...if anyone does plz step forward, if not i will try and speak with Lyonnais for some tips.
of cause its all worth the trouble if there are more than 1-2 users willing to join.
so, just give a vote guys if you are interested. _________________ Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics...
Even if you win, you're still retarded. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|